W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > April 2010

RE: Draft #1: Transition Request: First Public Working Group Note for Associating Schemas with XML documents 1.0

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 16:08:20 -0400
Message-ID: <CF83BAA719FD2C439D25CBB1C9D1D30212E9A039@HQ-MAIL4.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: <liam@w3.org>
Cc: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Actually, I did a pubrules and discovered that I had
omitted the Lastest Version bit, so I just regenerated
the draft.  In doing so, I added a paragraph to the
status right after the "don't cite this document"
paragraph (which text is required but bothers me,
because the whole point of the Note is precisely to
allow it to be referenced in place of the ISO version
that will not be generally available).  I added:

 However, this specification is expected to be used as
 the basis for similar standards or specifications by
 the W3C other standards bodies, so the basic content
 of this WG Note may be--or may become--referenceable
 in another form.

So we have the unique paragraph.  Let me know if anyone
objects to that paragraph.

paul

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Liam R E Quin [mailto:liam@w3.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, 2010 April 07 13:41
> To: Grosso, Paul
> Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Draft #1: Transition Request: First Public Working Group
> Note for Associating Schemas with XML documents 1.0
> 
> On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 14:17 -0400, Grosso, Paul wrote:
> > Here is my first (probably only) draft Transition Request
> > for WG Note for Associating Schemas with XML documents 1.0.
> >
> > I have staged the WG Note-ready draft at
> > http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/04/xml-model/
> >
> > I have not changed the body from that at
> > http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/01/xml-model/
> > (except to hide the editors notes), but I fiddled with
> > the header matter and status.
> >
> > Jirka, please sanity check to make sure I didn't forget
> > anything we said we'd do to this document.
> >
> > Liam, Carine, please let me know whether the SotD looks okay,
> There's supposed to be a "unique paragraph" in there somewhere,
> saying what the document is about, but I actually think the
> abstract is sufficient here.
> 
> > and let me know if I have the "To" list below correct (the
> > transition doc says "domain lead").
> ph is indeed the domain lead, and you've cc'd chairs and comm,
> so looks good here.
> 
> Liam
> 
> --
> Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
> Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
> Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org www.advogato.org
Received on Wednesday, 7 April 2010 20:08:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 April 2010 20:08:49 GMT