W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > March 2008

Re: Transition Request: (2nd) PER Request for XML Base Second Edition

From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:05:54 -0400
To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Cc: "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>, timbl@w3.org, steve@w3.org, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org, webreq@w3.org, chairs@w3.org, w3t-comm@w3.org, Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, michelsu@microsoft.com
Message-ID: <20080313140554.GI18467@mercury.ccil.org>

Disclaimer:  I don't speak *for* the Core WG, just as a member of it.

Chris Lilley scripsit:

> What is the timescape for RFC 3987bis? I see its at draft 2
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-duerst-iri-bis-02.txt
> published 18 Dec 2007. When is it expected to become an RFC? I assume
> (given the wording above) that this is not expected to happen before
> 30 June, but how long after that?

RFCs are subject to an unpredictable delay between the time they are
approved and the time they are published with an RFC number, typically
months.  Nothing can be done about this.

> Is the same change (to reference RFC 3987bis) expected to be made to XLink 1.1?

Yes.

> Should specifications that currently use IRI in XML specify LEIRI instead?

No.  The "L" in "LEIRI" stands for "Legacy"; the LEIRI definition
simply collects under one roof the existing anything-goes definitions
of URI-like objects in older specs (XML 1.0 system identifiers, XLinks,
XML Schema anyURIs, etc.)

-- 
Real FORTRAN programmers can program FORTRAN    John Cowan
in any language.  --Allen Brown                 cowan@ccil.org
Received on Thursday, 13 March 2008 14:06:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 13 March 2008 14:06:48 GMT