Re: Agenda for today's (2006-06-21) telcon

Here is a summary of comments so far on the Namespaces PERs, and my
recommendations as to what to do about them:

(1)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-names-editor/2006Jun/0001.html

The examples say <?xml version="1.1"?> in both the 1.0 and 1.1 versions.
We'll fix the 1.0 version before REC.


(2)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-names-editor/2006Jun/0002.html

There's a "MUST NOT" that is not marked as a RFC2119 term.
We'll fix it before REC.


(3)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-names-editor/2006Jun/0003.html

This one is mistaken, but leads to a suggestion for an erratum later.


(4)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-names-editor/2006Jun/0010.html

This one suggests that we should use <dfn> instead of <b> for definitions.
It's an xmlspec issue and not one we need fix right now.


(5)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-names-editor/2006Jun/0013.html

This one concerns the references to the XML specs.
We'll update them before going to REC, but should we refer to dated
versions or not?

-- Richard