W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > June 2006

Re: Agenda for today's (2006-06-21) telcon

From: Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:48:59 +0100 (BST)
To: public-xml-core-wg <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20060621114859.E79AB6E6C6F@macintosh.inf.ed.ac.uk>

Here is a summary of comments so far on the Namespaces PERs, and my
recommendations as to what to do about them:

(1)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-names-editor/2006Jun/0001.html

The examples say <?xml version="1.1"?> in both the 1.0 and 1.1 versions.
We'll fix the 1.0 version before REC.


(2)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-names-editor/2006Jun/0002.html

There's a "MUST NOT" that is not marked as a RFC2119 term.
We'll fix it before REC.


(3)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-names-editor/2006Jun/0003.html

This one is mistaken, but leads to a suggestion for an erratum later.


(4)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-names-editor/2006Jun/0010.html

This one suggests that we should use <dfn> instead of <b> for definitions.
It's an xmlspec issue and not one we need fix right now.


(5)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-names-editor/2006Jun/0013.html

This one concerns the references to the XML specs.
We'll update them before going to REC, but should we refer to dated
versions or not?

-- Richard
Received on Wednesday, 21 June 2006 11:49:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:34 GMT