Agenda for XML Core WG telcon of 2006 July 26

We have an XML Core WG phone call scheduled for Wednesday, 
July 26, from
          08:00-09:00 Pacific time aka
          11:00-12:00 Eastern time aka
          15:00-16:00 UTC
          16:00-17:00 in Ireland and the UK
          17:00-18:00 in middle (most of) Europe
          20:30-21:30 in most of India
on the Zakim W3C Bridge, +1 617 761 6200, passcode 9652#.
We also use IRC channel #xmlcore on irc.w3.org:6665 .

See the XML Core group page [1] for pointers to current documents
and other information.  If you have additions to the agenda, please
email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon.

Please also review our group page's task list [2] for accuracy and
completeness and be prepared to amend if necessary and accept it
at the beginning of the call.


Agenda
======
1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and
   the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments,
   or corrections ready by the beginning of the call).


2. Miscellaneous administrivia and document reviews.

TLR regrets until August 2nd.

The XML Activity has expired, but I haven't heard anything about
an extension.  Philippe, Henry, what is the status?


3.  C14N 

At the f2f, we decided to produce a W3C WG Note documenting 
the current situation and issues and problems.

Thomas wrote an outline of this note at
http://www.w3.org/2006/04/c14n-note

Konrad will continue as co-editor of this note.

----

The latest editor's draft of C14N 1.1 is at
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2006/05/WD-xml-c14n11-20060510.html

We discussed the xml:base wording in 2.4. 

CONSENSUS: We will refer to 3986 and describe only the differences. 

Konrad sent his latest proposed wording at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2006Jun/0032

Richard looked at Konrad's latest wording. He is dubious about 
repeating a complete algorithm here; he'd rather reference 
another algorithm (from 3987) and indicate the differences. 

ACTION to Konrad: Make clearer what steps in the algorithm in 
the appendix are the same as 3987 and which ones are different.

Richard sent some related email at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2006Jun/0056


4.  xml:base, [baseURI], and IRIs.

At the f2f, we had CONSENSUS to change the 
xml:base spec to make it clear we allow IRIs as the 
value of xml:base. We also want to allow IRIs in the 
infoset [baseURI] information item.

One paragraph in the Infoset says the baseURI may
have unescaped characters, but elsewhere it says
the baseURI follows XML Base which points to RFC 2396.
If we change XML Base, we shouldn't have to change
the Infoset spec much.


5.  XLink update.

XLink is now in CR--published at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-xlink11-20060328/ 

Norm sent some email about his test suite at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2006Mar/0066

Henry explains that Norm created some code (to check xlinks
and xml:base) as well as test documents.  Henry put up the
documents, but he needs to work with W3M to put up the code.
Otherwise, we could just put up the output.

ACTION to Henry:  Continue to put up the XLink test suite
including the code if feasible.

Paul wrote a draft PR request at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2006Jul/0001

We think there is nothing else to do before PR except
creating an up to date Disposition of Comments.

ACTION to Norm:  Create an XLink DoC.


6. XML errata.  The published 1.0 errata document is [8], the
   published 1.1 errata document is [9], and the new (public)
   Potential Errata (PE) document is [7]. 

XML 1.0/1.1 PERs were published on 2006 June 14 with a 
PER end date of July 12.

ACTION to Henry:  Plan to report on the status of this review.

PLH:  There an issue with references to 2396 vrs 3986.

Francois agrees with making these changes by making 
them errata and then reflecting the changes in the
the Recommendations.

Henry has no problem with making these changes.

ACTION to Francois:  Process these as errata and
fold into the Rec version of the specs.


7. Namespaces in XML.

NS 1.0/1.1 PERs were published on 2006 June 14 with a 
PER end date of July 12.

ACTION to Henry:  Plan to report on the status of this review.

PLH:  There an issue with references to 2396 vrs 3986.

We will refer to the (dated) 2nd and 4th editions 
of XML 1.1 and XML 1.0 respectively.

ACTION to Richard:  Make these changes.

There have been several editorial issues raised as
summarized by Richard at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2006Jun/0044

ACTION to Richard:  Prepare new editors' copies of the two 
specs with the editorial changes required by the comments 
other than Anne's.

ACTION to Richard:  Record Anne's issue/proposed resolution
in the Namespace PE document.

ACTION to Richard:  Prepare a Disposition of Comments.


8. Xinclude Rec was published 2004 December 30 at:
   http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xinclude-20041220/

Our XInclude potential errata document is at:
http://www.w3.org/XML/2005/01/proposed-xinclude-errata

Daniel has updated the Errata document at
http://www.w3.org/2004/12/xinclude-errata 

Daniel has drafted XInclude 2nd Edition with all 
the errata (including the IRI one) applied. Result is 
http://www.w3.org/XML/2006/04/XInclude/REC-xinclude-20060423.html
with a diff version at
http://www.w3.org/XML/2006/04/XInclude/REC-xinclude-20060423-review.html

Still need to handle errata document for the new edition
and other front matter.

Paul sent a draft PER request at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2006May/0044

The current plan is to publish XInclude 2e and send it for 
PER during the last week of June [*** needs revision ***].

DV reports that there are a few changes in the XInlude 
errata that could benefit from a test suite. 

ACTION: DV to propose new XInclude tests.


9.  Associating stylesheets--awaiting TAG action.

Henry reports that the HTML CG has been discussing this
for a while.  They are developing a draft statement of
the issue, and Chris Lilley will raise this at the XML CG.

Chris started the discussion on the XML CG list--see
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-cg/2005Jul/thread.html#15
The XML CG will continue to discuss it for a while.


10.  Henry raises that RFC 3023 is out of date and the draft
replacement has expired.  

Chris has gotten the source and made the changes.

There is a draft at
http://www.w3.org/2006/02/son-of-3023/draft-murata-kohn-lilley-xml-02.tx
t
that can be reviewed now with comments sent to the XML Core
mailing list and/or Chris Lilley.

Paul sent some comments on 3023bis to the XML CG at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-cg/2006Apr/0026

Henry says Chris is going to take the XML CG input outlined at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-cg/2006Apr/0019
and produce another draft.

Chris and Henry also are backing "xpointer scheme" down 
from "registered" to "pending" in the registry.

We will now await a new draft from Chris.

When 3023bis becomes a reality, we might have some
specs that need updating for the reference, but we
don't expect any major changes.


[1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core
[2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2006Jun/0054
[7]
http://www.w3.org/XML/2004/02/proposed-xml10-3e-and-xml11-errata.html
[8] http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V10-3e-errata
[9] http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V11-1e-errata

Received on Monday, 24 July 2006 11:00:59 UTC