W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > February 2005

Agenda for XML Core WG telcon of 2005 February 16

From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 10:51:49 -0500
Message-ID: <F13E1BF26B19BA40AF3C0DE7D4DA0C03031E79E7@ati-mail01.arbortext.local>
To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>

We have an XML Core WG phone call scheduled for Wednesday, 
February 16, from
          08:00-09:00 Pacific time aka
          11:00-12:00 Eastern time aka
          16:00-17:00 UTC
          16:00-17:00 in Ireland and the UK
          17:00-18:00 in middle (most of) Europe
on the Zakim W3C Bridge, +1 617 761 6200, passcode 9652#.
We also use IRC channel #xmlcore on irc.w3.org:6665 .

See the XML Core group page [1] for pointers to current documents
and other information.  If you have additions to the agenda, please
email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon.

Please also review our group page's task list [2] for accuracy and
completeness and be prepared to amend if necessary and accept it
at the beginning of the call.

Agenda
======
1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and
   the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments,
   or corrections ready by the beginning of the call).


2. Miscellaneous administrivia.

The next W3C Technical Plenary Week will be 28 February 2005
through 4 March 2005:
     http://www.w3.org/2002/09/TPOverview.html
     http://www.w3.org/2004/12/allgroupoverview.html 

The XML Core WG f2f meeting days will be Thursday and Friday, 
March 3rd and 4th.  Wednesday is the Plenary day to which all
XML Core WG members are invited.

Register for the meeting at: 
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TP2005/

Register at the hotel: 
http://www.w3.org/2004/12/allgroupoverview.html#Venue. 
The negotiated room rate at the meeting hotel, Hyatt Harborside, 
http://harborside.hyatt.com/property/index.jhtml is $139 (plus 
12.45% tax); this discount rate expires 5 February 2005.

We have a tentative meeting time with the TAG on Thursday
has been RESCHEDULED to the end of Thursday morning.  We
might find ourselves discussing "XML 2.0".


3.  XLink update.

Our WG Note "Extending XLink 1.0" has been published:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/NOTE-xlink10-ext-20050127/

W3C staff have been asked to start drafting an XML Core WG
charter modification that would (if approved by the AC)
allow us to work on XLink 1.0.  Said charter mod will also
probably hand us maintenance of the C14N spec(s?).


4. XML errata.  The published 1.0 errata document is [8], the
   published 1.1 errata document is [9], and the NEW PUBLIC
   Potential Errata (PE) document is [7]. 


5. Namespaces in XML.

  Ongoing ACTION to Richard:  Produce a draft for NS1.0 2nd Ed.

Paul checked with W3C folks about whether we can
fold editorial errata from 1.1 back into 1.0 2nd Ed
and our plan is acceptable:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Nov/0041

Richard pointed out a namespace comment at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-names-editor/2004Dec/0000
which requests something which is almost a different kind of schema.

ACTION to Richard:  Send email outlining the issue and your suggested
resolution.


6. Xinclude Rec was published 2004 December 30 at:
   http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xinclude-20041220/

It has been brought to my attention that we apparently failed
to look at the public XInclude comments list for comments
received during the PR review which is basically the October
archives for this list:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-xinclude-comments/2004Oct/
We will treat these are errata.  

DV volunteers to be editor of the XInclude errata process.

ACTION to DV:  Create a PE document for XInclude.


7. xml:id.

The CR was published (2005 Feb 8) at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/CR-xml-id-20050208/

The (public) xml:id LC issues is at:
http://www.w3.org/XML/2004/xml-id/lc-status/status-report.html
The LC DoC is at:
http://www.w3.org/XML/2005/01/xml-id-lc-doc.html
Our implementation report is at
http://www.w3.org/XML/2005/01/xml-id-implementation.html
We have a test suite cover page at
http://www.w3.org/XML/Test/xml-id/

The issue of xml:id vrs C14N and the definition of
namespaces is ongoing, originally in the xml:id 
comments list and now on the www-tag list.  It seems
likely that the TAG will pick up some issue out of this.

I'm not sure how or if this should affect our CR period,
but for now, I'm assuming it doesn't.


8.  Associating stylesheets
    We have had several requests to issue some clarifications
    on use of fragment identifiers in URIs to referenced
    stylesheets:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2005Feb/0022
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2005Feb/0030


9.  absolutivity of [base URI]
    Norm has asked a question about the absolutivity of [base URI]:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2005Feb/0031


10. XML 1.1 and C1 control characters
    Norm has raised a question about the need to escape C1 control
    characters in XML 1.1 (which is backward incompatible with XML 1.0):
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2005Feb/0033 


paul

[1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core
[2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2005Feb/0020
[7]
http://www.w3.org/XML/2004/02/proposed-xml10-3e-and-xml11-errata.html
[8] http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V10-3e-errata
[9] http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V11-1e-errata
Received on Monday, 14 February 2005 15:51:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:32 GMT