W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > October 2004

Re: Agenda for XML Core WG telcon of 2004 October 20

From: Sandra Martinez <sandra.martinez@nist.gov>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:49:50 -0400
Message-Id: <>
To: "Paul Grosso" <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
Cc: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>


At 11:35 AM 10/18/2004, Paul Grosso wrote:

>We have an XML Core WG phone call scheduled for Wednesday,
>Ocotber 20, from
>           08:00-09:00 Pacific time aka
>           11:00-12:00 Eastern time aka
>           15:00-16:00 UTC
>           16:00-17:00 in Ireland and the UK
>           17:00-18:00 in middle (most of) Europe
>on the Zakim W3C Bridge, +1 617 761 6200, passcode 9652#.
>We also use IRC channel #xmlcore on irc.w3.org:6665 .
>[For those wondering, the switch from daylight savings time
>to standard time occurs on October 31st for the home locale
>of everyone on the WG.]
>See the XML Core group page [1] for pointers to current documents
>and other information.  If you have additions to the agenda, please
>email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon.
>Please also review our group page's task list [2] for accuracy and
>completeness and be prepared to amend if necessary and accept it
>at the beginning of the call.
>1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and
>    the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments,
>    or corrections ready by the beginning of the call).
>2. Miscellaneous administrivia.
>The next W3C Technical Plenary Week will be 28 February 2005
>through 4 March 2005:
>      http://www.w3.org/2002/09/TPOverview.html
>The meeting will be held in the Hyatt Harborside, Boston:
>      http://harborside.hyatt.com/property/index.jhtml
>3. Problem with xml:space in the Schema document for the XML namespace
>Masayasu Ishikawa <mimasa@w3.org> sent us email on this at:
>CONSENSUS to remove the default for xml:space from the schema
>for the xml namespace.
>Henry drafted a new schema and send it to the XML Core list:
>Henry's suggested new schema includes xml:id.  Are we anticipating
>too much here?
>Henry and DV think it's fine.  Norm too.  What about others?
>Barring new comments to the contrary, we will approve the change
>this week.
>4. XML errata.  The published 1.0 errata document is [8], the
>    published 1.1 errata document is [9], and the NEW PUBLIC
>    Potential Errata (PE) document is [7].
>Glenn has raised a question at
>about the wording for the ANY and mixed content models and whether
>they allow cdata sections and/or comments and PIs.
>All on the phone (and Francois in previous email) agree that we meant
>to allows cdata sections and PIs and comments in these models.
>Glenn proposed corrected wording at:
>We had CONSENSUS to go with Glenn's words (with Paul's commas).
>ACTION to Francois:  Make this a PE and put Glenn's words into
>a 2 week countdown (starting Oct 13th).
>The xml-editor list just received a comment at
>which is presumably asking the same question asked earlier at
>and which the commenter claims we never answered satisfactorily.
>I see at
>JohnC suggested:
>   8) NEL issue can be bypassed by using different transcoding
>   See
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2003OctDec/0048.html .
>   Recommendation:  Reject.  Special code pages for XML are undesirable,
>   and older mainframe tools can't cope with them anyway.
>I cannot find any response to commentor, DOC for the XML 1.1 PR (beyond
>this email) or other follow up.
>I suggest we need to make this latest comment a PE and be sure to
>process it carefully to document whatever decision we take.
>ACTION to Francois:  Make xml-editor/2004OctDec/0003 a PE.
>5. Namespaces in XML.
>   ACTION to Richard:  Produce a draft for NS1.0 2nd Ed.
>6. Xinclude PR was published Sept 30 at:
>    http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/PR-xinclude-20040930/
>    and announced to the AC at
>    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2004JulSep/0043
>    Please be sure your AC reps vote on it by October 29.
>Sandra has added ERH's tests to the XInclude Test Suite.
>Check on status of recently added ERH tests (I gather they
>are in CVS, but not in the tar or zip, but maybe I'm mistaken).
>7. xml:id.
>Norm has collected the xml:id issues, now (public) at:
>[Not quite up to date as of the writing of this agenda, but
>all issues are closed.]
>Norm just put a new draft (2004 October 15) up at:
>It presumably reflects all our decisions.  READ IT!
>If the WG approves, we could consider taking it to Last Call.
>What do members think?
>8.  XML Profile.  The TAG (via Norm) asks about progress on this:
>[1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core
>[2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks
>[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Oct/0009
>[8] http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V10-3e-errata
>[9] http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V11-1e-errata

Sandra I. Martinez
National Institute of Standards and Technology
100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8970,
Gaithersburg, Md. 20899

(301) 975-3579
Received on Wednesday, 27 October 2004 13:50:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:33 UTC