W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > October 2004

Re: XML namespace files revisited

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:48:52 +0100
To: "Paul Grosso" <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
Cc: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <f5bu0sgff0b.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk>

ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) writes:

> However, on 2 June [3], despite neither Richard or me having done
> anything, we find:
>    "| 2. XML Schema WG is handing off maintenance of the XML namespace to us:
>     |    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-core-wg/2004JanMar/0251
>     |
>     |   ACTION to Richard and Henry: Implement the above suggestion to fix
>     |   up the XML namespace directory.
>    "Completed."
> Oops.

> [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-core-wg/2004AprJun/0120.html

Well, it turns out on further examination we did _some_, but not all,
of the action.

This bit has been done:

   "We should fix things so that http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace
    return just the RDDL document regardless of content-type.  Richard
    and Henry know how to do this and suggest we do this.

This bit hasn't:

   "In addition, they suggest we add comments to the obsolete schemas
    saying they are obsolete."

I'll do that, but not today.

 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Wednesday, 27 October 2004 13:48:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:33 UTC