W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xhtml2@w3.org > June 2007

Re: input on name for XML serialization of HTML 5?

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 04:21:49 -0500
To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Cc: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>, public-xhtml2@w3.org
Message-Id: <1182244909.6367.81.camel@pav>

On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 16:47 -0500, Shane McCarron wrote:
> Actually, I think that any XHTML name should be based upon the XHTML 
> Modularization architecture going forward.  Moreover, given the 
> divergent directions HTML and XHTML are going at this point, trying to 
> overload the term XHTML can only lead to confusion and frustration among 
> our various constituencies.
> 
> I feel very strongly that the "xml serialization" of HTML 5 should NOT 
> be called anything with XHTML in its name.


I see. I'm standing by to see if that's the position of the
XHTML 2 WG. I'm offering to relay comments from the XHTML 2 WG
as a whole.

For individual positions, feel free to contribute them
to the HTML WG directly (public-html@w3.org ).

> > If you'd like to elaborate on that, or endorse it as a group,
> > or anything like that, please do, and let me know, and I'll
> > relay it back to the HTML WG. Or you can join the discussion
> > directly, if you prefer, either as individuals or as
> > a delegated liaison.


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2007 09:21:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 February 2010 18:12:46 GMT