W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > January 2012

Re: My slightly comments

From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 23:35:17 +0100
Cc: public-xg-webid@w3.org
Message-Id: <0B9F9419-3629-4980-B43C-912A11B89296@bblfish.net>
To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>

On 10 Jan 2012, at 23:28, Kingsley Idehen wrote:

> On 1/10/12 5:22 PM, Henry Story wrote:
>> 
>> Ok. For the RESTfulness of the spec I have asked people on REST discuss to see if they can give us feedback.
> Be careful with REST, we don't need the distraction of mercurial concept descriptions.
> 
> Folks implementing WebID verifiers or generators simply need to know that they will be working with URIs and conduits to graphs via "data access by reference patterns".
> 
> You've already covered the resources, representation, cache invalidation, content negotiation, names, and addresses as the apply to the WebID verification protocol. I encourage you not to open up a "what is REST" endless debate around WebID :-)

Ok. But I'd like the REST fans to see that we are on their side, and do a bit of advertising for us. :-)

I mean at some point doing the right thing should be rewarded, right?

> 
> -- 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Kingsley Idehen	
> Founder&  CEO
> OpenLink Software
> Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
> Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
> Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
> Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
> LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/
Received on Tuesday, 10 January 2012 22:35:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 10 January 2012 22:35:51 GMT