W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > January 2012

Re: My slightly comments

From: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:06:25 -0500
Message-ID: <CAGR+nnH8P9g=Mz9YFqomtb-1n4R+QmfU71JbMxAjOHYbBShbPQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dominik Tomaszuk <ddooss@wp.pl>
Cc: WebID Incubator Group WG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Hi Domel,

On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Dominik Tomaszuk <ddooss@wp.pl> wrote:

> My comments to the lastest version in repo [1]:
> 1.3 Namespaces - in the table there is 'bob' which isn't use in spec. It
> can be removed.
>

yes, I removed some of the bob:me we were using before in the Turtle for
example. I also think adding the WebID profile as a namespace will confuse
people (the trend now is to do away with namespaces, or to at least reduce
them as much as possible). I haven't made that change yet as I'd like to
double check the spec on that again.


>
> 3.1 Authentication Sequence - point 5  - "The returned representation is
> then transformed into an RDF graph as specified in Processing the WebID
> Profile". I think it would be worth to add reference to RDF spec (what does
> RDF graph mean) [2]
>

add reference to RDF-MT [1].


>
> 3.1 Authentication Sequence - point 5  - "That graph is then queried as
> explained in Querying the Graph. If the query is answered positively, then
> that WebID is verified." - also add reference to SPARQL (what does querying
> the graph mean) [3]
>

I don't think we should put any reference here, since it is not tied to
SPARQL only, and this is detailed further in the spec, with a reference to
SPARQL there.


>
> 3.1 Authentication Sequence - point 5  - "That graph is then queried as
> explained in Querying the Graph. If the query is answered positively, then
> that WebID is verified." - link "Querying the Graph" is broken.
>

good catch. fixed the link, see diff [1].


>
> C.2 Informative references - I think [RDF-CONCEPTS] and [RDF-SPARQL-QUERY]
> have the same status. So why [RDF-CONCEPTS] is informative?
>

that's a respec bug/feature, will look into this.

Thanks,
Steph.

[1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/rev/78b6924a3043


> Best regards,
> Dominik 'domel' Tomaszuk
>
>
> [1] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/**raw-file/6da4ac1999d6/spec/**
> index-respec.html<http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/6da4ac1999d6/spec/index-respec.html>
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-**rdf-concepts-20040210/<http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-concepts-20040210/>
> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-**rdf-sparql-query-20080115/<http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-rdf-sparql-query-20080115/>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 10 January 2012 16:07:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 10 January 2012 16:07:07 GMT