W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > January 2012

Re: FOAF SSL success, form windows RDFa (via linked data)

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:32:36 -0500
Message-ID: <4F0B7914.8000608@openlinksw.com>
To: public-xg-webid@w3.org
On 1/9/12 6:18 PM, Peter Williams wrote:
> Finally, I made a long uri into a tiny URI, with nice QR code. Is the point that this COULD be pointing at my proxy URI (and the cRUI could be going in the cert SAN URI?) If so, this bvegs the redirects question I posed a while ago. Are validators supposed to following redirects (or not).

And that question manifests at some point when (if possible) we Henry 
get beyond what seems to be a covert mandate of # based HTTP URIs in 
SAN. Once you go beyond the HTTP # based style of URI Name, you hit 
indirection via HTTP responses for redirection. Basically, the slash 
based HTTP URI and 303 issue.



Kingsley Idehen	
Founder&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen

Received on Monday, 9 January 2012 23:33:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:06:29 UTC