W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-mmsem@w3.org > February 2007

Interoperability Framework and Vocabulary

From: Jeff Z. Pan <jpan@csd.abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:34:43 -0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <1971.202.105.75.68.1172064883.squirrel@www.csd.abdn.ac.uk>
To: public-xg-mmsem@w3.org


Dear Michael and authors of use cases,

After some thoughts, it seems to me that there is quite a connection
between the interoperability framework and the vocabulary deliverable. The
goal of the former one is to provide an integrated set of vocabulary
within a simple extensible framework. In fact, an integrated set of
vocabulary is
the most needed component in the framework. The simplest form of
integration is to assert samePropertyAs; i.e., we should be able to say
property P1 in standard S1 is the same as the property P2 in standard S2.
Given the use cases that we have, I wonder how hard it is to identify such
equivalent relations. Furthermore, given the use cases, I wonder if there
are any other cross standard/vocabulary relations that we have to handle
in the simple framework.

Could you share with Vassilis and me your thoughts on these?

Greetings,
Jeff


-- Dr. Jeff Z. Pan (http://www.csd.abdn.ac.uk/~jpan/) Department of
Computing Science, The University of Aberdeen
Received on Wednesday, 21 February 2007 13:35:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:21 GMT