W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > January 2011

Re: No use of PREMIS in the Archives cluster?

From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:09:04 -0800
Message-ID: <20110117170904.56437ik49fg5573k@kcoyle.net>
To: Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
Cc: public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Well, I made the list from what's in the actual use case documents,  
and PREMIS wasn't there. We could add it in anyway.

kc

Quoting Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>:

> Karen, Emmanuelle, all,
>
> I was noting that the quite long list of relevant vocabularies
> and technologies for the Archives cluster [1] includes some
> XML-based standards such as METS, but I'm a bit surprised to
> see no mention of PREMIS, especially since one of the extracted
> use cases [2] deals with:
>
>     Data management improvement: Build network of institutions
>     using similar metadata to describe preservation actions...
>
> I know Ed was involved in an effort to express the PREMIS vocabulary
> in RDF [3] but I do not know the status of that effort or its
> reception in the PREMIS community.  There is at any rate no mention
> of RDF on the Wikipedia page for PREMIS [4].
>
> Can anyone shed light on this?
>
> Tom
>
> [1]  
> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Cluster_Archives#Vocabularies_and_Technologies
> [2]  
> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Cluster_Archives#Extracted_Use_Cases
> [3] http://annotation.lanl.gov/premis/premis_rdf.pdf
> [4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PREMIS
>
> --
> Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
>
>



-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
ph: 1-510-540-7596
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet
Received on Tuesday, 18 January 2011 01:09:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 18 January 2011 01:09:40 GMT