W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > January 2011

RE: Cases

From: Young,Jeff (OR) <jyoung@oclc.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:34:50 -0500
Message-ID: <52E301F960B30049ADEFBCCF1CCAEF590B019F1F@OAEXCH4SERVER.oa.oclc.org>
To: <gordon@gordondunsire.com>, "Ray Denenberg" <rden@loc.gov>, "public-xg-lld" <public-xg-lld@w3.org>, "Antoine Isaac" <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
I agree that it fits naturally with the authority data cluster.





From: gordon@gordondunsire.com [mailto:gordon@gordondunsire.com] 
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 7:16 AM
To: Ray Denenberg; public-xg-lld; Young,Jeff (OR); Antoine Isaac
Subject: Re: Cases




I agree that the Component vocabularies use case doesn't belong in the Vocabulary alignment cluster.


It would fit better in the Authority data cluster, if we interpret "entities associated with the resource described, e.g. names, title, subjects, geographic names, etc." to essentially mean authority data (in a linked data environment). The use case is saying that a linked data environment is better for linking entities in bibliographic metadata records, and envisages authority data being expanded beyond the current/traditional author/name and subject entities.


The use case also fits (but not as well) with the BibData cluster; it refers to a possible transition stage in the move of focus from record to triple (i.e. link as much as possible to the "record"). I will add it as a related use case to the BibData cluster if the Authority data cluster is willing to incorporate it.







On 13 January 2011 at 21:09 Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote:

> Dear all,
> As mentioned in today's call, we have been doubting whether two cases should be assigned to the Vocabulary alignment cluster [1]:
> - Component Vocabularies  [1]
> - Subject Search [2]
> These cases do not mention alignment openly. In fact they don't feature multiple vocabularies that should be aligned or merged.
> So we would gladly welcome two kinds of assistance here:
> 1. case owners (Jeff and Ray) or curators (Gordon) to make a bit more explicit the "alignment" dimension of the cases, if they can, or to identify another cluster from [4] where they'd fit better, if they agree with us that the current clustering is not optimal;
> 2. other cluster's curators to "adopt" these two cases, if they think they would fit well their own cluster. Note that we already started the job by identifying the general goal of the cases [5] and noting down the associated vocabularies--and these cases are indeed very interesting ones!
> Thanks a lot for your help,
> Marcia, Michael, Antoine
> [1]  http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Cluster_VocAlign

> [2]  http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Use_Case_Component_Vocabularies

> [3] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Use_Case_Subject_Search

> [4]  http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/UseCases

> [5] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Cluster_VocAlign#Scenarios_.28Case_Studies.29 

Received on Friday, 14 January 2011 14:35:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:56 UTC