There is no particular reason for Component Vocabularies to be in the vocabulary alignment cluster. I would be inclined to suggest think that the most appropriate cluster for it would be Authority Data (except that there is no description yet on the page for that cluster; but there certainly does not seem to be any other appropriate cluster). --Ray > -----Original Message----- > From: public-xg-lld-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-lld-request@w3.org] > On Behalf Of Antoine Isaac > Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 4:09 PM > To: Young,Jeff (OR); Denenberg, Ray; Gordon Dunsire; public-xg-lld > Subject: Cases > > Dear all, > > As mentioned in today's call, we have been doubting whether two cases > should be assigned to the Vocabulary alignment cluster [1]: > - Component Vocabularies [1] > - Subject Search [2] > > These cases do not mention alignment openly. In fact they don't feature > multiple vocabularies that should be aligned or merged. > > So we would gladly welcome two kinds of assistance here: > > 1. case owners (Jeff and Ray) or curators (Gordon) to make a bit more > explicit the "alignment" dimension of the cases, if they can, or to > identify another cluster from [4] where they'd fit better, if they > agree with us that the current clustering is not optimal; > > 2. other cluster's curators to "adopt" these two cases, if they think > they would fit well their own cluster. Note that we already started the > job by identifying the general goal of the cases [5] and noting down > the associated vocabularies--and these cases are indeed very > interesting ones! > > Thanks a lot for your help, > > Marcia, Michael, Antoine > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Cluster_VocAlign > [2] > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Use_Case_Component_Vocabulari > es > [3] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Use_Case_Subject_Search > [4] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/UseCases > [5] > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Cluster_VocAlign#Scenarios_.2 > 8Case_Studies.29Received on Friday, 14 January 2011 14:41:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 14 January 2011 14:41:58 GMT