Jeff, > There are subtle but troubling differences between the two documents > that we've ignored so far. I don't think it's LLD XG's job to reconcile > them, but until this happens I think Linked Data will remain an enigma > to many people. Yes, that's probably worth to have a closer look in the future. I hope you're keeping track of these--on the topics wiki page, maybe ;-) > I agree that Tim's document is the one to read first because it is light > and intuitive. If someone wants to actually create Linked Data, though, > they really should read the Cool URIs document. > > I would rather see one link rather than zero. Tim's design issues > document is fine. We've got a deal! Thanks, AntoineReceived on Saturday, 4 September 2010 08:10:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 4 September 2010 08:10:56 GMT