W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > September 2010

Re: Use case mail

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 10:10:14 +0200
Message-ID: <4C81FEE6.6000600@few.vu.nl>
To: "Young,Jeff (OR)" <jyoung@oclc.org>
CC: public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Jeff,


> There are subtle but troubling differences between the two documents
> that we've ignored so far. I don't think it's LLD XG's job to reconcile
> them, but until this happens I think Linked Data will remain an enigma
> to many people.


Yes, that's probably worth to have a closer look in the future. I hope you're keeping track of these--on the topics wiki page, maybe ;-)

  
> I agree that Tim's document is the one to read first because it is light
> and intuitive. If someone wants to actually create Linked Data, though,
> they really should read the Cool URIs document.
>
> I would rather see one link rather than zero. Tim's design issues
> document is fine.


We've got a deal!

Thanks,

Antoine
Received on Saturday, 4 September 2010 08:10:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 4 September 2010 08:10:56 GMT