W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > September 2010

Re: Use case mail

From: Emmanuelle Bermes <emmanuelle.bermes@bnf.fr>
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 20:36:06 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=niYT+bPnyr9YzhVw2bH5bhO4HTFG3LcNekA9i@mail.gmail.com>
To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Cc: "Young,Jeff (OR)" <jyoung@oclc.org>, public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Is there a reason why we don't provide a link to [1] ? From there people can
get all the links to other references including TBL's Design issues
document.

Emmanuelle

[1] http://linkeddata.org/

On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote:

> Jeff,
>
>
>
>  There are subtle but troubling differences between the two documents
>> that we've ignored so far. I don't think it's LLD XG's job to reconcile
>> them, but until this happens I think Linked Data will remain an enigma
>> to many people.
>>
>
>
> Yes, that's probably worth to have a closer look in the future. I hope
> you're keeping track of these--on the topics wiki page, maybe ;-)
>
>
>
>
>> I agree that Tim's document is the one to read first because it is light
>> and intuitive. If someone wants to actually create Linked Data, though,
>> they really should read the Cool URIs document.
>>
>> I would rather see one link rather than zero. Tim's design issues
>> document is fine.
>>
>
>
> We've got a deal!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Antoine
>
>


-- 
=====
Emmanuelle Bermès - http://www.bnf.fr
Manue - http://www.figoblog.org
Received on Sunday, 5 September 2010 18:36:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 5 September 2010 18:36:39 GMT