W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-audio@w3.org > December 2010

Re: Making Web Audio APIs More Competitive with native

From: <jussi.kalliokoski@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:26:19 +0200
Message-ID: <4d020e5d.9155df0a.42e7.603b@mx.google.com>
To: srikumarks@gmail.com,"Noah Mendelsohn" <nrm@arcanedomain.com>,"Chris Rogers" <crogers@google.com>,public-xg-audio@w3.org,"Doug Schepers" <schepers@w3.org>
Hi,

I think OpenSL is more of an implementation choice than one to do with the web audio API, which provides a much higher level API than OpenSL. (correct me if I'm wrong, my knowledge of OpenSL is limited)

Best regards,
Jussi Kalliokoski,
Web Developer,
Aldebaran

Sent from my HTC

----- Reply message -----
From: "Kumar" <srikumarks@gmail.com>
To: "Noah Mendelsohn" <nrm@arcanedomain.com>, "Chris Rogers" <crogers@google.com>, <public-xg-audio@w3.org>, "Doug Schepers" <schepers@w3.org>
Subject: Making Web Audio APIs More Competitive with native
Date: Fri, Dec 10, 2010 8:00 am


Hi all,

I joined the public forum relatively recently and
I've been reading this thread with great interest.
The work on the audio API thus far is impressive.

That said, I couldn't help wonder whether some of
the initiatives in other standards groups can be
merged into this effort - particularly that of
OpenSL ES (http://www.khronos.org/opensles/)
That would make the audio path symmetric compared
to what the visual group is doing with WebGL, which
is taking OpenGL ES and making it available via
a JavaScript API built atop Canvas 3D.

Any thoughts on this? On first glance, there doesn't
seem to be anything particularly limiting about
OpenSL ES (to me at least) that would make it
inappropriate for web use. I hope to get a better
idea of it in the coming days.

Anyone here who straddles both groups?

Regards,
-Srikumar

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 3:28 AM, Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 12/9/2010 2:12 PM, Chris Rogers wrote:
>>
>> I don't expect that a JavaScript developer is going to play with my API
>> for
>> a couple of weeks and come back with Digital Audio Workstation software to
>> rival something like Apple's Logic Audio
>
> Indeed, but if we set off down the path that would lead to such things in,
> say 5 years, with interesting DAWs of lesser capability emerging along the
> way, that would be really wonderful.  I'm actually curious what will prove
> to be implementable in Javascript over time from a performance point of
> view.  E.g. it's very cool that Javascript is doing FFts with plausible
> performance today, but it will be interesting to see when it can do 20 in
> parallel on a many core chip.  Still, this all looks very, very promising.
>  Thanks!
>
> Noah
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 10 December 2010 11:26:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 10 December 2010 11:26:56 GMT