W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wsc-wg@w3.org > July 2007

Re: ACTION 238: Create and Document Usability Testing Plan

From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:49:34 -0400
Cc: "W3 Work Group" <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF7C5C1B61.C3AE6734-ON85257315.00664516-85257315.00676AA8@LocalDomain>
To: rachna.w3c@gmail.com
"Can users distinguish chrome from content?"

I'm glad you call that out separately. I'd like to talk about what impact 
studying that may or may not have. It's my opinion that we will (and 
should) make recommendations on the primary SCI in read only mode. This is 
based on a couple things. Team conversations seemed to provide the 
consensus that there are risky situations in read only mode (which means 
there are trust decisions that users make on the web from just reading 
information). Given that agreement, it is my personal opinion that user 
agents will display primary SCIs (as well they should). Given that user 
agents will display SCIs, it is our job and duty to provide the best 
recommendations we can, to raise the bar as much as possible on the 
security and utility of primary SCIs in read only mode. 

So, even if users cannot distinguish chrome from content, I don't see how 
that would impact our discussions. Even if it adds proposals around 
warnings, I still don't see primary SCIs not appearing after those 
warnings (and I mean in the best case the kinds of warnings that studies 
have shown have impact on the user). 

"Can users effectively use different "modes"? "

That's a good one too. If, in a limited study, we find or know they 
cannot, I'm not sure if that will shift the locus of the discussion. 
Starting from the original workshop, and continuing at least into a 
comment from Phill at a recent call, the locus of discussion will instead 
be (I believe) "Can users learn to effectively use different 'modes'". It 
is clear that users can and do learn. Though not necessarily at all what 
we would try to teach them. I wonder what evidence we have for what kinds 
of things users can and do learn over time. 

          Mez

(ACTION-238, ACTION-235, ACTION-236, for tracker, in case anyone replies)






ACTION 238: Create and Document Usability Testing Plan

Rachna Dhamija 
to:
W3 Work Group
07/11/2007 12:03 AM


Sent by:
public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org







We have started working on a testing plan and will be documenting our work 
here (not much yet, but we'll be adding material over the next weeks):
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/UsabilityStudies 

This does not discharge Action 238, as it is an ongoing action.  Is there 
a way to handle this, other than continually changing dates?  I would like 
to close Actions 235 and 236, which overlap with this one.

We don't have anything to report on the upcoming call, but may ask for 
some time on the next one.

Rachna
Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2007 18:49:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 5 February 2008 03:52:49 GMT