W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wsc-wg@w3.org > April 2007

RE: Comments RE: The Working draft - section 6.2

From: Robert Yonaitis <ryonaitis@hisoftware.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 17:29:23 -0400
Message-ID: <AAD1044DDFFCC84895A899314A72FB6CF9250F@be04.exg3.exghost.com>
To: "Mary Ellen Zurko" <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
Cc: <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
   Hello All:

 

Sorry for the delay on this. Some clarification: My Number one (1) was
basically meant to suggest that web browsers are launched every day
embedded in applications and in some cases it is known and some cases it
is not. Like a HP Quickest  or server based applications.

 

My two, I think, is a bit more complex or perhaps covered else where. I
will draw up fuller description and submit to see if it is relevant. (I
would also think local or remote makes sense)

 

Thank You,

 

Rob Yonaitis

 

 

________________________________

From: Mary Ellen Zurko [mailto:Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com] 
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 8:36 AM
To: Robert Yonaitis
Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Comments RE: The Working draft - section 6.2

 


Good comments on 6.2.

You're talking this line, right?:

Finally, a web browser might have been launched by some local
application.

On your 1., I think we don't want SaaS to be hiding critical security
information the user needs. But I'm also missing how that's linked to
launching a web browser. 

On your 2., it's certainly true that, for example, in my company, remote
software can cause things to happen locally on my machine. It's how
upgrades and patches are managed. So while there is some local
application (the OS) in the middle, your point is well taken about cause
and effect. I'm fuzzy on the definition of SaaS. Would it cover all
remote programs, or is it more restrictive? I would have guessed the
latter. So how about changing "local" to "local or remote"? 

          Mez

Mary Ellen Zurko, STSM, IBM Lotus CTO Office       (t/l 333-6389)
Lotus/WPLC Security Strategy and Patent Innovation Architect




"Robert Yonaitis" <ryonaitis@hisoftware.com> 

04/03/2007 08:51 PM

To

"Mary Ellen Zurko" <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>,
<public-wsc-wg@w3.org>, <yonaif4a@erau.edu>

cc

 

Subject

Comments RE: The Working draft

 

 

 




Hello All:
 
Please accept my following comments to the following document:
http://www.w3.org/TR/wsc-usecases/ <http://www.w3.org/TR/wsc-usecases/> 
 
The following are offered as comments, questions and or suggestions.
 
 
 
Section 6 - Use Cases Comments
 
6.2 - My suggestion for this section is to either remove "some local
application" or replace it with "a local or SaaS application". I make
this distinction because 
1. Software may be provided with increasing frequency as a service, and
that SaaS could potentially hide some common items we are discussing
2. "Local" is limiting especially if we are using some sort of software
distribution service, etc. While in the past comments I have said that
we need to be unambiguous in the case of defining where an application
is being launched from I would recommend that we be ambiguous or at
least more general. 
 

 

Cheers,

Robert B. Yonaitis

Founder and CTO
HiSoftware
http://www.hisoftware.com/

<https://exg3.exghost.com/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.hisoftwar

e.com/> 
603-496-7414



The information in this transmittal (including attachments, if any) is
privileged and confidential and is intended only for the recipient(s)
listed above.  Any review, use, disclosure, distribution or copying of
this transmittal is prohibited except by or on behalf of the intended
recipient.  If you have received this transmittal in error, please
notify me immediately by reply email and destroy all copies of the
transmittal.  Thank you.







The information in this transmittal (including attachments, if any) is privileged and confidential and is intended only for the recipient(s) listed above.  Any review, use, disclosure, distribution or copying of this transmittal is prohibited except by or on behalf of the intended recipient.  If you have received this transmittal in error, please notify me immediately by reply email and destroy all copies of the transmittal.  Thank you.
Received on Thursday, 12 April 2007 21:29:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 5 February 2008 03:52:46 GMT