W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-resource-access@w3.org > September 2009

Re: safeness text

From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 09:19:45 -0400 (EDT)
To: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
cc: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0909020918160.14285@wnl.j3.bet>
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Doug Davis wrote:

> Yves,
>  For the one operation in each spec that has been deemed 'safe', I was
> thinking of just adding this text after the definition of the operation:
> This operation will not result in any side effect imputable to the
> requester. This means that in case of an underlying protocol error that
> might get unnoticed, resending the same request can be done automatically.
> Does this work for you?

Yes, with a minor modification, can we say "This operation is safe; It 
will not result in..." ?
(ie: I'd like to keep the 'safe' in the text somewhere)

Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.

Received on Wednesday, 2 September 2009 13:19:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:34:52 UTC