W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-resource-access@w3.org > September 2009

Re: safeness text

From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 09:27:14 -0400
To: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Cc: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFB064B9E7.9F9ABCF2-ON85257625.0049E6EF-85257625.0049EB16@us.ibm.com>
Works for me.  thanks

STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.

Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org> 
09/02/2009 09:19 AM

Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
Re: safeness text

On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Doug Davis wrote:

> Yves,
>  For the one operation in each spec that has been deemed 'safe', I was
> thinking of just adding this text after the definition of the operation:
> This operation will not result in any side effect imputable to the
> requester. This means that in case of an underlying protocol error that
> might get unnoticed, resending the same request can be done 
> Does this work for you?

Yes, with a minor modification, can we say "This operation is safe; It 
will not result in..." ?
(ie: I'd like to keep the 'safe' in the text somewhere)

Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.

Received on Wednesday, 2 September 2009 13:28:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:34:52 UTC