- From: Li, Li (Li) <lli5@avaya.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:33:06 -0400
- To: <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
Gil, Thanks for the proposals. I have a few questions below. 1) After your revisions to the event tags, they now look very much like SAWSDL, another W3C spec [1]. Would you consider adopting it instead of inventing a new one? 2) WSDL already has a construct called port type that can group event types (operations). If WSDL 2.0 is used, you can even get an interface hierarchy (sort of like topic tree). Should we reuse this structure for identifying event types as well? 3) Your examples attach event tags to the <wse:eventType> element devised in a proposal to issue 6401. Do these examples suggest the event tags can only be used in that element and therefore this issue (6917) is dependent on issue 6401? [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/sawsdl/ Li
Received on Monday, 3 August 2009 16:33:51 UTC