AW: Issue 6917: preliminary proposal for Event Tags; tag values

Hi.

Was usage of WS-Topics (whether fully or in a profiled form) already
discarded by the working group? If yes, what were the reasons to do so?

Best regards,
Johannes Echterhoff




> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-resource-
> access-request@w3.org] Im Auftrag von Li, Li (Li)
> Gesendet: Montag, 3. August 2009 18:33
> An: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
> Betreff: Re: Issue 6917: preliminary proposal for Event Tags; tag values
> 
> Gil,
> 
> Thanks for the proposals. I have a few questions below.
> 
> 1) After your revisions to the event tags, they now look very much like
> SAWSDL, another W3C spec [1]. Would you consider adopting it instead of
> inventing a new one?
> 
> 2) WSDL already has a construct called port type that can group event
> types (operations). If WSDL 2.0 is used, you can even get an interface
> hierarchy (sort of like topic tree). Should we reuse this structure for
> identifying event types as well?
> 
> 3) Your examples attach event tags to the <wse:eventType> element
> devised in a proposal to issue 6401. Do these examples suggest the event
> tags can only be used in that element and therefore this issue (6917) is
> dependent on issue 6401?
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/sawsdl/
> 
> 
> Li
>

Received on Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:32:42 UTC