W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy@w3.org > July 2007

RE: [New Issue] Issue 4762: Media type section update

From: Asir Vedamuthu <asirveda@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 12:02:58 -0700
To: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>, "public-ws-policy@w3.org" <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C9BF0238EED3634BA1866AEF14C7A9E5443818769F@NA-EXMSG-C116.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

Given the new info from Philippe [1], should the sentence in question be dropped? That is,

s/The "application/wspolicy+xml" media type is being submitted to the IESG for review, approval, and registration with IANA.//

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Jul/0014.html

Regards,

Asir S Vedamuthu
Microsoft Corporation


-----Original Message-----
From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Felix Sasaki
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 6:07 AM
To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
Subject: [New Issue] Issue 4762: Media type section update


Title: Media type section update
Target: Framework, appendix A (first paragraph)
Description: We need to update the media type section. We are now in
step 5.2 of the media type registration process "IESG Approval"
described in http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4288.txt .
Proposal:

replace

The "application/wspolicy+xml" media type is being submitted to the IESG
for review, approval, and registration with IANA.

with

The "application/wspolicy+xml" media type is being submitted to the IESG
for approval and registration with IANA.

Currently this is an CR issue. I don't regard this as critical for going
to PR. If there is no time for handling this before the PR transition
request, I'm fine with making it a PR issue.

Felix
Received on Friday, 13 July 2007 19:04:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:52 GMT