Re: [New Issue] Issue 4762: Media type section update

Asir Vedamuthu wrote:
> Given the new info from Philippe [1], should the sentence in question be dropped? 

agree.

Felix

> That is,
>
> s/The "application/wspolicy+xml" media type is being submitted to the IESG for review, approval, and registration with IANA.//
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Jul/0014.html
>
> Regards,
>
> Asir S Vedamuthu
> Microsoft Corporation
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Felix Sasaki
> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 6:07 AM
> To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
> Subject: [New Issue] Issue 4762: Media type section update
>
>
> Title: Media type section update
> Target: Framework, appendix A (first paragraph)
> Description: We need to update the media type section. We are now in
> step 5.2 of the media type registration process "IESG Approval"
> described in http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4288.txt .
> Proposal:
>
> replace
>
> The "application/wspolicy+xml" media type is being submitted to the IESG
> for review, approval, and registration with IANA.
>
> with
>
> The "application/wspolicy+xml" media type is being submitted to the IESG
> for approval and registration with IANA.
>
> Currently this is an CR issue. I don't regard this as critical for going
> to PR. If there is no time for handling this before the PR transition
> request, I'm fine with making it a PR issue.
>
> Felix
>
>
>

Received on Monday, 16 July 2007 06:18:41 UTC