RE: new PR Framework issue

Not sure that it is necessary, but I created the action:

        http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/332

Cheers,

Christopher Ferris
STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris
phone: +1 508 234 2986

public-ws-policy-request@w3.org wrote on 07/12/2007 09:47:22 PM:

> 
> We request the WG to assign a tickler action to one of the editors 
> to prepare a proposal to update references in both the Framework and
> Attachment specs in August (just in time).
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Asir S Vedamuthu
> Microsoft Corporation
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Frederick Hirsch
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 1:08 PM
> To: public-ws-policy@w3.org policy
> Cc: Hirsch Frederick
> Subject: new PR Framework issue
> 
> 
> New Issue, bugzilla:  http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4851
> 
> Title: Update C14N11 reference in WS-Policy Framework
> 
> Description: WS-Policy Framework references Working Draft for
> Cannonical XML 1.1, but document is at CR
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/PR-ws-policy-20070706/#Informative-References
> 
> Justification: Should be as accurate as possible
> 
> Proposal: Change Canonical XML 1.1 reference date to 21 June 2007,
> and status from "Working Draft" to "Candidate Recommendation" in WS-
> Policy Framework
> 
> regards, Frederick
> 
> Frederick Hirsch
> Nokia
> 
> 
> 
>