Paul Cotton wrote: > Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 09 - 2006-09-06 [snip] > > 7. Bugzilla entries that need updating, Chair > Status: I believe the following issues have been resolved but the Bugzilla entries have not yet been updated. > [snip] > > b) Clarify the relation of overlapping definitions in the framework > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3562 > Owner: Felix Sasaki > I am not sure if this is closed. The thread at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Jul/0045.html ends with a proposal from Frederik: > My preference is to define the terms that are needed in the Framework in > the Framework document, then additional terms needed in Attachments in > that document. Add note to Attachments that other terms associated with Framework are defined in that document. We don't have made that change in the Attachment document. Should we do that? I would be fine with it. FelixReceived on Wednesday, 6 September 2006 16:54:07 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:41 GMT