W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org > September 2006

RE: Need a call tomorrow?

From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 16:19:34 -0700
To: Prasad Yendluri <prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com>
CC: "public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org" <public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org>, Toufic Boubez <tboubez@layer7tech.com>, Maryann Hondo <mhondo@us.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <4D66CCFC0B64BA4BBD79D55F6EBC225712CCD828FE@NA-EXMSG-C103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Thanks for this detailed review of the Editorial actions and for your updates.  Chris and I are meeting tomorrow and will use this to ensure that next week's WG agenda is as effective as possible.

/paulc


Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329
mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com




________________________________
From: Prasad Yendluri [mailto:prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com]
Sent: September 21, 2006 1:23 PM
To: Paul Cotton; Prasad Yendluri; Toufic Boubez; Maryann Hondo
Cc: public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
Subject: RE: Need a call tomorrow?

Hi Paul (et. al),

I have reviewed all the WG AIs assigned to editors (listed below in your original note). Here is an update on each of them:

>4. Editorial team report
>
>a) Terms should be defined/targeted in the appropriate sections of the spec, Editors
>http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3720
>Action item:
>http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/98

PY> From the f2f IRC log (@ http://www.w3.org/2006/09/12-ws-policy-irc), I find
ACTION: Glen to find/reopen or open a new issue re: clarifying section 1 and making definitions point to the sections where terms are normatively defined.
19:22:08 [trackbot]
Created ACTION-98 - Find/reopen or open a new issue re: clarifying section 1 and making definitions point to the sections where terms are normatively defined. [on Glen Daniels - due 2006-09-19].

The original AI was on Glen to open the issue. As you listed above, the corresponding bug 3720 seems to have been opened.
So it seems the AI itself should be considered done. I am not sure why we wanted a bug to be opened, but is this bug ready to be assigned to the editors (or further discussion in the WG is needed on the bug)?  The bug status is still "NEW".

b) Editors to clarify the use of the term "domain", Editors
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3706
Action item:
http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/94

PY> Corresponding Editors Action Item is (#14): http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/14
I have updated WG AI 94 with information on the corresponding Editors AI.

c) In Section 3.1 add a link to sec 4.3.2 from "policy expression nesting", Editors
http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/95

PY> Corresponding Editors Action Item is (#13): http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/13
I have updated WG AI 95 with information on the corresponding Editors AI.

d) Review next editors draft to see if there are any security considerations from framework doc that apply to attachment doc, Editors
http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/110

PY> The Corresponding editors Action Item is (#44): http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/44
I have updated WG AI 110 with information on the corresponding Editors AI.

e) Add proposed text for Issue 3577, Editors
http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/107

PY> Corresponding Editors' AI is (#29): http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/29
I have updated WG AI 107 with information on the corresponding Editors AI.

f) WS-Policy Primer, Editors
ACTION: Prepare an editor's draft of the primer (ETA - determined by editors) and send it to the WG
http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/103

PY> The Corresponding editors Action Item is (#22): http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/22
I have updated WG AI 103 with information on the corresponding Editors AI.

g) WS-Policy Guidelines for Policy Authors, MaryAnn
Status: The following actions are pending:
ACTION: Prepare Editor's Draft of Guidelines document:
http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/102

PY>Corresponding Editors' AI is (42): http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/42
I have updated WG AI 102 with information on the corresponding Editors AI.

ACTION: Add adopted guidance to Guidelines document for Issue 3577:
http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/108

PY>Corresponding Editors' AI is (42): http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/43
I have updated WG AI 108 with information on the corresponding Editors AI.

Regards,
Prasad
________________________________
From: public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Paul Cotton
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 6:33 PM
To: Prasad Yendluri; Toufic Boubez; Maryann Hondo
Cc: public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
Subject: RE: Need a call tomorrow?

>On a quick review, it seems at least a couple of them are duplicates of the Editorial AIs

Please feel free to update the WG action items with the appropriate Editor action item numbers.

/paulc


Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329
mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com


________________________________
From: Prasad Yendluri [mailto:prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com]
Sent: September 20, 2006 9:08 PM
To: Paul Cotton; Toufic Boubez; Maryann Hondo; Prasad Yendluri
Cc: public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
Subject: RE: Need a call tomorrow?

Paul,

I have the task to present the Ed team status for the WG call.
On a quick review, it seems at least a couple of them are duplicates of the Editorial AIs.
I will get the latest status on all these for the WG call.

Regards,
Prasad

________________________________
From: public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Paul Cotton
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 2:47 PM
To: Toufic Boubez; Maryann Hondo; Prasad Yendluri
Cc: public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
Subject: RE: Need a call tomorrow?

I just updated the agenda for next week's WS-Policy WG.  Can someone from the Editorial team please be ready to give a status on the following items.  If some of these WG action items are duplicates of Editorial action items just let the WG know when/how they will be done.

/paulc

***

4. Editorial team report

a) Terms should be defined/targeted in the appropriate sections of the spec, Editors
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3720
Action item:
http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/98

b) Editors to clarify the use of the term "domain", Editors
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3706
Action item:
http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/94

c) In Section 3.1 add a link to sec 4.3.2 from "policy expression nesting", Editors
http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/95

d) Review next editors draft to see if there are any security considerations from framework doc that apply to attachment doc, Editors
http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/110

e) Add proposed text for Issue 3577, Editors
http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/107

f) WS-Policy Primer, Editors
ACTION: Prepare an editor's draft of the primer (ETA - determined by editors) and send it to the WG
http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/103

g) WS-Policy Guidelines for Policy Authors, MaryAnn
Status: The following actions are pending:
ACTION: Prepare Editor's Draft of Guidelines document:
http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/102
ACTION: Add adopted guidance to Guidelines document for Issue 3577:
http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/108

***


Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329
mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com

________________________________
From: public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Toufic Boubez
Sent: September 19, 2006 5:34 PM
To: Maryann Hondo; Prasad Yendluri
Cc: public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org; public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org
Subject: RE: Need a call tomorrow?

Sounds good. Next call is Wednesday September 27 at 11am PT. I will send an agenda the day before.  --  Toufic

Toufic Boubez, Ph.D.
Chief Technology Officer

LAYER 7 TECHNOLOGIES / Advancing the application network.
604.681.9377 x310 (w)   604.288.7970 (m)
tboubez@layer7tech.com<BLOCKED::mailto:tboubez@layer7tech.com> (e)  www.layer7tech.com<BLOCKED::/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.layer7tech.com/> (w)
________________________________
From: Maryann Hondo [mailto:mhondo@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 12:05 PM
To: Prasad Yendluri
Cc: public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org; public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org; Toufic Boubez
Subject: RE: Need a call tomorrow?


works for me.
maryann
Prasad Yendluri <prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com>
Sent by: public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org

09/19/2006 02:43 PM

To

Toufic Boubez <tboubez@layer7tech.com>, public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org

cc



Subject

RE: Need a call tomorrow?










I don't think we need it (we have no topics to discuss). We all have of plenty of AIs (editing work) that we targeted for completing by Monday (9/25). Perhaps we could use that time towards that instead.

Thanks.

Prasad


________________________________

From: public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Toufic Boubez
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 11:28 AM
To: public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
Subject: Need a call tomorrow?

As decided in our last f2f, I am supposed to ask if we need to have an editors' call tomorrow. If not, the next call will be as scheduled on Wednesday September 27. Thanks!  --  Toufic

Toufic Boubez, Ph.D.
Chief Technology Officer

LAYER 7 TECHNOLOGIES / Advancing the application network.
604.681.9377 x310 (w)   604.288.7970 (m)
tboubez@layer7tech.com<BLOCKED::mailto:tboubez@layer7tech.com> (e)  www.layer7tech.com<BLOCKED::/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.layer7tech.com/> (w)
Received on Thursday, 21 September 2006 23:22:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:27:49 UTC