W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org > September 2006

RE: Need a call tomorrow?

From: Prasad Yendluri <prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:22:52 -0700
Message-ID: <A3E375FA108EF94496269A5A96AFCAC106B521CF@mailwest-e0b>
To: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Prasad Yendluri <prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com>, Toufic Boubez <tboubez@layer7tech.com>, Maryann Hondo <mhondo@us.ibm.com>
Cc: public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
Hi Paul (et. al),

 

I have reviewed all the WG AIs assigned to editors (listed below in your
original note). Here is an update on each of them:

 

>4. Editorial team report

> 

>a) Terms should be defined/targeted in the appropriate sections of the
spec, Editors

>http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3720
<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3720> 

>Action item:

> <http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/98>
http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/98 

 

PY> From the f2f IRC log (@ http://www.w3.org/2006/09/12-ws-policy-irc
<http://www.w3.org/2006/09/12-ws-policy-irc> ), I find 

ACTION: Glen to find/reopen or open a new issue re: clarifying section 1 and
making definitions point to the sections where terms are normatively
defined.

19:22:08 [trackbot]

Created ACTION-98 - Find/reopen or open a new issue re: clarifying section 1
and making definitions point to the sections where terms are normatively
defined. [on Glen Daniels - due 2006-09-19].

 

The original AI was on Glen to open the issue. As you listed above, the
corresponding bug 3720 seems to have been opened.

So it seems the AI itself should be considered done. I am not sure why we
wanted a bug to be opened, but is this bug ready to be assigned to the
editors (or further discussion in the WG is needed on the bug)?  The bug
status is still "NEW". 

 

b) Editors to clarify the use of the term "domain", Editors

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3706
<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3706> 

Action item:

 <http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/94>
http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/94 

 

PY> Corresponding Editors Action Item is (#14):
<http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/14>
http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/14

I have updated WG AI 94 with information on the corresponding Editors AI.

 

c) In Section 3.1 add a link to sec 4.3.2 from "policy expression nesting",
Editors 

http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/95
<http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/95> 

 

PY> Corresponding Editors Action Item is (#13):
http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/13
<http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/13> 

I have updated WG AI 95 with information on the corresponding Editors AI.

 

d) Review next editors draft to see if there are any security considerations
from framework doc that apply to attachment doc, Editors

http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/110
<http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/110>  

 

PY> The Corresponding editors Action Item is (#44):
http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/44
<http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/44> 

I have updated WG AI 110 with information on the corresponding Editors AI.

 

e) Add proposed text for Issue 3577, Editors

http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/107
<http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/107> 

 

PY> Corresponding Editors' AI is (#29):
<http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/29>
http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/29

I have updated WG AI 107 with information on the corresponding Editors AI.

 

f) WS-Policy Primer, Editors

ACTION: Prepare an editor's draft of the primer (ETA - determined by
editors) and send it to the WG

http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/103
<http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/103> 

 

PY> The Corresponding editors Action Item is (#22):
http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/22
<http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/22> 

I have updated WG AI 103 with information on the corresponding Editors AI.

 

g) WS-Policy Guidelines for Policy Authors, MaryAnn

Status: The following actions are pending:

ACTION: Prepare Editor's Draft of Guidelines document:

http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/102
<http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/102> 

 

PY>Corresponding Editors' AI is (42):
<http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/42>
http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/42

I have updated WG AI 102 with information on the corresponding Editors AI.

 

ACTION: Add adopted guidance to Guidelines document for Issue 3577:

http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/108
<http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/108>  

 

PY>Corresponding Editors' AI is (42):
http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/43
<http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/43> 

I have updated WG AI 108 with information on the corresponding Editors AI.

 

Regards,

Prasad

  _____  

From: public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Paul Cotton
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 6:33 PM
To: Prasad Yendluri; Toufic Boubez; Maryann Hondo
Cc: public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
Subject: RE: Need a call tomorrow?

 

>On a quick review, it seems at least a couple of them are duplicates of the
Editorial AIs

 

Please feel free to update the WG action items with the appropriate Editor
action item numbers.

 

/paulc

 

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329
mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com <mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> 




  _____  

From: Prasad Yendluri [mailto:prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com] 
Sent: September 20, 2006 9:08 PM
To: Paul Cotton; Toufic Boubez; Maryann Hondo; Prasad Yendluri
Cc: public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
Subject: RE: Need a call tomorrow?

 

Paul,

 

I have the task to present the Ed team status for the WG call. 

On a quick review, it seems at least a couple of them are duplicates of the
Editorial AIs.

I will get the latest status on all these for the WG call.

 

Regards,

Prasad

 

  _____  

From: public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Paul Cotton
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 2:47 PM
To: Toufic Boubez; Maryann Hondo; Prasad Yendluri
Cc: public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
Subject: RE: Need a call tomorrow?

 

I just updated the agenda for next week's WS-Policy WG.  Can someone from
the Editorial team please be ready to give a status on the following items.
If some of these WG action items are duplicates of Editorial action items
just let the WG know when/how they will be done.

 

/paulc

 

***

 

4. Editorial team report

 

a) Terms should be defined/targeted in the appropriate sections of the spec,
Editors

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3720
<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3720> 

Action item:

http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/98
<http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/98>  

 

b) Editors to clarify the use of the term "domain", Editors

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3706
<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3706> 

Action item:

http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/94
<http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/94>  

 

c) In Section 3.1 add a link to sec 4.3.2 from "policy expression nesting",
Editors 

http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/95
<http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/95> 

 

d) Review next editors draft to see if there are any security considerations
from framework doc that apply to attachment doc, Editors

http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/110
<http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/110>  

 

e) Add proposed text for Issue 3577, Editors

http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/107
<http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/107> 

 

f) WS-Policy Primer, Editors

ACTION: Prepare an editor's draft of the primer (ETA - determined by
editors) and send it to the WG

http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/103
<http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/103> 

 

g) WS-Policy Guidelines for Policy Authors, MaryAnn

Status: The following actions are pending:

ACTION: Prepare Editor's Draft of Guidelines document:

http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/102
<http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/102> 

ACTION: Add adopted guidance to Guidelines document for Issue 3577:

http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/108
<http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/108>  

 

***

 

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329
mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com <mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> 

  _____  

From: public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Toufic Boubez
Sent: September 19, 2006 5:34 PM
To: Maryann Hondo; Prasad Yendluri
Cc: public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org; public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org
Subject: RE: Need a call tomorrow?

 

Sounds good. Next call is Wednesday September 27 at 11am PT. I will send an
agenda the day before.  --  Toufic

 

Toufic Boubez, Ph.D.
Chief Technology Officer
 
LAYER 7 TECHNOLOGIES / Advancing the application network.
604.681.9377 x310 (w)   604.288.7970 (m)

 <BLOCKED::mailto:tboubez@layer7tech.com> tboubez@layer7tech.com (e)
<BLOCKED::/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.layer7tech.com/>
www.layer7tech.com (w)

  _____  

From: Maryann Hondo [mailto:mhondo@us.ibm.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 12:05 PM
To: Prasad Yendluri
Cc: public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org; public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org; Toufic
Boubez
Subject: RE: Need a call tomorrow?

 


works for me. 
maryann 


Prasad Yendluri <prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com> 
Sent by: public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org 

09/19/2006 02:43 PM 


To

Toufic Boubez <tboubez@layer7tech.com>, public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org 


cc

 


Subject

RE: Need a call tomorrow?

 


 

 




I don't think we need it (we have no topics to discuss). We all have of
plenty of AIs (editing work) that we targeted for completing by Monday
(9/25). Perhaps we could use that time towards that instead. 
  
Thanks. 
  
Prasad 
  

 

  _____  


From: public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Toufic Boubez
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 11:28 AM
To: public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
Subject: Need a call tomorrow? 
  
As decided in our last f2f, I am supposed to ask if we need to have an
editors' call tomorrow. If not, the next call will be as scheduled on
Wednesday September 27. Thanks!  --  Toufic 
  
Toufic Boubez, Ph.D.
Chief Technology Officer

LAYER 7 TECHNOLOGIES / Advancing the application network.
604.681.9377 x310 (w)   604.288.7970 (m)
 <BLOCKED::mailto:tboubez@layer7tech.com> tboubez@layer7tech.com (e)
<BLOCKED::/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.layer7tech.com/>
www.layer7tech.com (w) 
  
Received on Thursday, 21 September 2006 17:25:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:27:49 UTC