W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-pnf-tf@w3.org > February 2003

RE: PFTF next telcon

From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 08:40:20 -0800
To: "'Sandeep Kumar'" <sandkuma@cisco.com>, "'Jean-Jacques Moreau'" <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "'Glen Daniels'" <gdaniels@macromedia.com>
Cc: "'FABLET Youenn'" <youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr>, <public-ws-pnf-tf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <003e01c2d1ec$4488fab0$b90ba8c0@beasys.com>

Let's just rule silly times out.  6:30 am is a silly time.  

Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-pnf-tf-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-ws-pnf-tf-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Sandeep Kumar
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 8:04 AM
> To: Jean-Jacques Moreau; Glen Daniels
> Cc: 'FABLET Youenn'; public-ws-pnf-tf@w3.org
> Subject: RE: PFTF next telcon
> 
> 
> 
> Yes, 6:30 am pst is very early for me. Is 9:30 or 10:00 am 
> PST suitable to
> everyone?
> That is right after WSD meeting.
> - sandeep
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-pnf-tf-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-ws-pnf-tf-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of 
> Jean-Jacques Moreau
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 7:42 AM
> To: Glen Daniels
> Cc: 'FABLET Youenn'; public-ws-pnf-tf@w3.org
> Subject: Re: PFTF next telcon
> 
> 
> 
> Sounds ok to me, although I suspect this might be too early for
> West Costers.
> 
> Jean-Jacques.
> 
> Glen Daniels wrote:
> > That time would be OK with me, though I might suggest :
> >
> > a) we take 90 minutes, since we'll presumably be doing work on the
> scenarios and it would be good to get some momentum going
> >
> > b) we augment the teleconference with IRC, so that we can 
> share syntactic
> examples/proposals without saying "open-bracket, wsdl colon 
> feature, uri
> equals quote..." :)
> 
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 11 February 2003 11:42:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Friday, 25 March 2005 11:17:44 GMT