- From: Sandeep Kumar <sandkuma@cisco.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 08:03:51 -0800
- To: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "Glen Daniels" <gdaniels@macromedia.com>
- Cc: "'FABLET Youenn'" <youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr>, <public-ws-pnf-tf@w3.org>
Yes, 6:30 am pst is very early for me. Is 9:30 or 10:00 am PST suitable to everyone? That is right after WSD meeting. - sandeep -----Original Message----- From: public-ws-pnf-tf-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-pnf-tf-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Jean-Jacques Moreau Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 7:42 AM To: Glen Daniels Cc: 'FABLET Youenn'; public-ws-pnf-tf@w3.org Subject: Re: PFTF next telcon Sounds ok to me, although I suspect this might be too early for West Costers. Jean-Jacques. Glen Daniels wrote: > That time would be OK with me, though I might suggest : > > a) we take 90 minutes, since we'll presumably be doing work on the scenarios and it would be good to get some momentum going > > b) we augment the teleconference with IRC, so that we can share syntactic examples/proposals without saying "open-bracket, wsdl colon feature, uri equals quote..." :)
Received on Tuesday, 11 February 2003 11:08:33 UTC