Re: PFTF next telcon

On Tue, 11 Feb 2003 08:03:51 -0800
"Sandeep Kumar" <sandkuma@cisco.com> wrote:

> 
> Yes, 6:30 am pst is very early for me. Is 9:30 or 10:00 am PST suitable to
> everyone?
> That is right after WSD meeting.

It would be *really* nice to have some sort of break between meetings.  Half an hour would be enough, but it would really help to be able to stand up and walk around a bit.  So I'm not thrilled by 9:30 (12:30 EST); would prefer 10:00 (1:00 EST), half an hour after the end of the WSD meeting.

Amy!
> - sandeep
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-pnf-tf-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-ws-pnf-tf-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Jean-Jacques Moreau
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 7:42 AM
> To: Glen Daniels
> Cc: 'FABLET Youenn'; public-ws-pnf-tf@w3.org
> Subject: Re: PFTF next telcon
> 
> 
> 
> Sounds ok to me, although I suspect this might be too early for
> West Costers.
> 
> Jean-Jacques.
> 
> Glen Daniels wrote:
> > That time would be OK with me, though I might suggest :
> >
> > a) we take 90 minutes, since we'll presumably be doing work on the
> scenarios and it would be good to get some momentum going
> >
> > b) we augment the teleconference with IRC, so that we can share syntactic
> examples/proposals without saying "open-bracket, wsdl colon feature, uri
> equals quote..." :)
> 
> 


-- 
Amelia A. Lewis
Architect, TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc.
alewis@tibco.com