Re: Acknowledging WSDL 2.0 issues.

Hi Jonathan,

I agree with the WG's resolution on all of these issues.

Thanks!
Ram


On 3/12/07, Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com> wrote:
>
>  As we prepare for our transition to PR, it would be very helpful to get
> an acknowledgement on a few of the issues that you raised with the group,
> stating whether you agree or disagree with our disposition (no action in
> each case) of the comment.  The result of having a recorded response from
> you will allow us to focus on those resolutions which are known to reflect a
> split between the Working Group and the community, instead of those where
> the existence of a split is unknown.
>
>
>
> The relevant issues are:
>
>
>
> ·         CR004 [1], and our response [2]
>
> ·         CR016 [3], and our response [4]
>
> ·         CR047 [5], and our response [6]
>
> ·         CR048 [7], and our response [8]
>
> ·         CR049 [9], and our response [10]
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR004
>
> [2]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2006Mar/0004.html
>
> [3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR016
>
> [4]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2006Mar/0015.html
>
> [5] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR047
>
> [6]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2006Oct/0005.html
>
> [7] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR048
>
> [8]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2006Oct/0005.html
>
> [9] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR049
>
> [10]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2006Oct/0005.html
>
>
>
> *Jonathan Marsh* - http://www.wso2.com -
> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
>
>
>



-- 
Shift to the left, shift to the right!
Pop up, push down, byte, byte, byte!

-Ramkumar Menon
A typical Macroprocessor