Acknowledging WSDL 2.0 issues.

As we prepare for our transition to PR, it would be very helpful to get an
acknowledgement on a few of the issues that you raised with the group,
stating whether you agree or disagree with our disposition (no action in
each case) of the comment.  The result of having a recorded response from
you will allow us to focus on those resolutions which are known to reflect a
split between the Working Group and the community, instead of those where
the existence of a split is unknown.

 

The relevant issues are:

 

.         CR056 [1], and our response [2]

.         CR131 [3], and our response [4]

.         CR140 [5], and our response [6]

 

Thanks!

 

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR056

[2]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2006Oct/0009.htm
l

[3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR131

[4]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2007Jan/0010.htm
l  

[5] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR140 

[6]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2007Jan/0011.htm
l

 

Jonathan Marsh -  <http://www.wso2.com> http://www.wso2.com -
<http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com