[LC9] Last Call issue: How does the Operation Name Mapping Requirement (Part 1, section 2.2.1.1) relate to interface inheritance?
binding fault defaulting?
Comments
default interface/operation/@pattern
Editorial last call review comments
Faults that are not described in WSDL?
I18N Comments, WSDL 2.0 Part I (partial)
In-Multi-Out MEP [was "WSDL 2.0 specification"]
LC Editorial Comment for WS-Addressing Core Specification
LC84a resolutions
LC84a/b resolutions
LC84b resolution
NEW ISSUE - message level binding?
Operation Name Mapping Requirement Bug
Part 2 editorial issue: "binding" versus "binding extension"
Problem with Service References: elementFormDefault="qualified" prevents restriction
What is the SOAP MEP for In-only
WSDL 2.0 2005-05-10 Working Draft Discrepancies
WSDL 2.0 LC Comments
wsdl:import semantics is different from xs:import
XForms comments on (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 3: Bindings
XML Schema comment "T2" on WSDL 2.0
{soap mep} property and SOAP 1.1 Binding
Last message date: Tuesday, 28 June 2005 21:11:09 UTC