- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 13:34:26 -0700
- To: "Hugo Haas" <hugo@w3.org>, <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
For the record, the Working Group agreed to address this problem by
adopting the solution you outlined in [1]. We will assume you agree
with this resolution if we don't hear from you by Oct 21st.
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Sep/0049.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC45
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc-
> comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Hugo Haas
> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 2:13 PM
> To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
> Subject: Part 3 section 3.6.2: {http location} not necessarily a
template
>
> Section 3.6.2 of Part 3 says:
>
> {http location}, a wsdls:anyURI. The value of this property
> specifies a template for the relative portion of the request URI for
> an operation. This URI is combined with the base URI specified in
> the {address} property of the endpoint element to form the full URI
> for the HTTP request to invoke the operation.
>
> Actually, this is a template only for the
> application/x-www-form-urlencoded serialization, and is defined as
> such in section 3.8.1. It isn't a template for other serializations we
> define.
>
> I suggest dropping the following sentence:
>
> The value of this property specifies a template for the relative
> portion of the request URI for an operation.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hugo
>
> --
> Hugo Haas - W3C
> mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Thursday, 7 October 2004 20:34:40 UTC