W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > October 2004

RE: URI Serialization: Order may be Lost

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 13:38:42 -0700
Message-ID: <7DA77BF2392448449D094BCEF67569A5053AF2B0@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Asir Vedamuthu" <asirv@webmethods.com>, <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
Cc: "Wes Moulder" <Wes@webMethods.com>

For the record, the Working Group decided to clarify section
to state that for list values, the order of the values in the list are
preserved in the url parameters. Same for auto-generated params.  We
will assume you agree with this resolution if we don't hear from you by
Oct 21st.

[See http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC17]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc-
> comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Asir Vedamuthu
> Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 6:46 PM
> To: 'public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org'
> Cc: Wes Moulder
> Subject: URI Serialization: Order may be Lost
> I am writing this e-mail on behalf of Wes Moulder, webMethods.
> ref:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-wsdl20-bindings-
> 20040803/#_http_operation_locat
> ion_notcited_uri
> "Uncited elements with list values are serialized as one name-value
> parameter pair per list value. The name of each parameter is the name
> the
> uncited element, and the value of each parameter is the corresponding
> value
> in the list."
> Is the order of the list value significant? If it is, this is a
> for
> a class of implementations: say implementations that use certain
> frameworks,
> such as servlet. Servlet framework does not capture the order.
> Particularly,
> this is an issue if my SOAP node is an intermediary and MEP is
> pattern.
> Regards,
> Asir S Vedamuthu
> asirv at webmethods dot com
> http://www.webmethods.com/
Received on Thursday, 7 October 2004 20:40:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:05:56 UTC