W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > June 2006

Re: Participants without roles, roles without behaviour

From: Gary Brown <gary@pi4tech.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 12:48:49 +0100
Message-ID: <448D54A1.7000903@pi4tech.com>
To: matthew@stickledown.com
CC: public-ws-chor@w3.org


At the moment I don't believe it is possible to define a role without a 
behavior - although the behavior does not need to define an interface.

However, I agree that in situations where a role is only acting as a 
client then the behavior is irrelevant.

Martin/Steve - should this be raised as an implementation issue?


Matthew Rawlings wrote:
> I followed your advice and turned each of my Participants into Roles. I
> still have the problem I am not permitted to define Roles without behaviour.
> How can I explicitly state a Role does not have behaviour?
> Matthew Rawlings
> +44 791 539 7824
Received on Monday, 12 June 2006 11:49:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 01:01:45 GMT