W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > June 2006

RE: Participants without roles, roles without behaviour

From: Matthew Rawlings <matthew@stickledown.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 12:01:56 +0100
Message-Id: <200606121101.k5CB1uCf032764@pyramid-04.kattare.com>
To: <public-ws-chor@w3.org>


I followed your advice and turned each of my Participants into Roles. I
still have the problem I am not permitted to define Roles without behaviour.
How can I explicitly state a Role does not have behaviour?

Matthew Rawlings
+44 791 539 7824

Received on Monday, 12 June 2006 11:02:11 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Gary Brown: "Re: Participants without roles, roles without behaviour"
Previous message: Gary Brown: "Proposal for issue 3104 - exchange types"
In reply to: Gary Brown: "Re: Participants without roles, roles without behaviour"
Next in thread: Gary Brown: "Re: Participants without roles, roles without behaviour"
Reply: Gary Brown: "Re: Participants without roles, roles without behaviour"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:36:46 GMT