W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > February 2004

Re: WSDL and pub/sub

From: Chiusano Joseph <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 14:45:30 -0500
Message-ID: <40311DDA.84B9898B@bah.com>
To: Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>
Cc: "Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>, Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM>, Burdett David <david.burdett@commerceone.com>, Andrew Berry <andyb@whyanbeel.net>, Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@enigmatec.net>, WS Choreography <public-ws-chor@w3.org>

Same with ebXML Registry. I think I should defer to Farrukh at this
point for a more detailed explanation. :)

Ugo Corda wrote:
> 
> I am not sure what you mean by "a Web Service that is external to the
> registry contents". In UDDI, all interactions with registry contents
> occur via Web service interfaces, and I thought the same was true for
> the ebXML Registry.
> 
> Ugo
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@bah.com]
> > Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 11:37 AM
> > To: Ugo Corda
> > Cc: Monica J. Martin; Farrukh Najmi; Burdett David; Andrew
> > Berry; Steve Ross-Talbot; WS Choreography
> > Subject: Re: WSDL and pub/sub
> >
> >
> > I believe that that is certainly one possible approach, and
> > if there were open Web Services eventing standards (meaning
> > open standards body) available at the time that the Event
> > Notification feature were architected it may/may not have
> > been done this way. However, would it be possible (or even
> > efficient) to have a subscriber be notified by a Web Service
> > that is external to the registry contents about and event
> > that happened to a RegistryObject within the registry? I
> > could be off base, but it seems to me that a more efficient
> > approach is to have the subscription "close" to the contents
> > themselves.
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > Joe Chiusano
> >
> > Ugo Corda wrote:
> > >
> > > I would have thought that an ebXML Registry client would
> > subscribe to
> > > the Registry itself (seen as a Web service) in order to get
> > > notifications on events related to the contents you
> > describe. Is that
> > > not so?
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > > Ugo
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@bah.com]
> > > > Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 11:02 AM
> > > > To: Monica J. Martin
> > > > Cc: Ugo Corda; Farrukh Najmi; Burdett David; Andrew Berry; Steve
> > > > Ross-Talbot; WS Choreography
> > > > Subject: Re: WSDL and pub/sub
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > It would also be highly unlikely that the ebXML Registry adopt
> > > > WS-Eventing or WS-Notification from the standpoint of their main
> > > > mission. The event notification feature of the registry
> > is based on
> > > > registry contents (subscriptions to RegistryObjects, etc.) rather
> > > > than subscriptions to Web Services themselves.
> > > >
> > > > Kind Regards,
> > > > Joe Chiusano
> > > > Member, ebXML Registry TC
> > > >
> > > > "Monica J. Martin" wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >Corda: Farrukh,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Do you guys have any plan of adopting one of the
> > emerging pub/sub
> > > > > >specs, i.e. WS-Eventing or WS-Notification?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Thank you,
> > > > > >Ugo
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > mm1: I believe someone on this list has already questioned the
> > > > > implications of any open standards' body adopting proprietary
> > > > > specifications.
> > > >
> >
Received on Monday, 16 February 2004 14:46:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 01:00:51 GMT