W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > February 2004

RE: WSDL and pub/sub

From: Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 11:42:20 -0800
Message-ID: <EDDE2977F3D216428E903370E3EBDDC9039589D0@MAIL01.stc.com>
To: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
Cc: "Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>, "Farrukh Najmi" <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM>, "Burdett David" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>, "Andrew Berry" <andyb@whyanbeel.net>, "Steve Ross-Talbot" <steve@enigmatec.net>, "WS Choreography" <public-ws-chor@w3.org>

I am not sure what you mean by "a Web Service that is external to the
registry contents". In UDDI, all interactions with registry contents
occur via Web service interfaces, and I thought the same was true for
the ebXML Registry.

Ugo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@bah.com] 
> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 11:37 AM
> To: Ugo Corda
> Cc: Monica J. Martin; Farrukh Najmi; Burdett David; Andrew 
> Berry; Steve Ross-Talbot; WS Choreography
> Subject: Re: WSDL and pub/sub
> 
> 
> I believe that that is certainly one possible approach, and 
> if there were open Web Services eventing standards (meaning 
> open standards body) available at the time that the Event 
> Notification feature were architected it may/may not have 
> been done this way. However, would it be possible (or even 
> efficient) to have a subscriber be notified by a Web Service 
> that is external to the registry contents about and event 
> that happened to a RegistryObject within the registry? I 
> could be off base, but it seems to me that a more efficient 
> approach is to have the subscription "close" to the contents 
> themselves.
> 
> Kind Regards,
> Joe Chiusano
> 
> Ugo Corda wrote:
> > 
> > I would have thought that an ebXML Registry client would 
> subscribe to 
> > the Registry itself (seen as a Web service) in order to get 
> > notifications on events related to the contents you 
> describe. Is that 
> > not so?
> > 
> > Thank you,
> > Ugo
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@bah.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 11:02 AM
> > > To: Monica J. Martin
> > > Cc: Ugo Corda; Farrukh Najmi; Burdett David; Andrew Berry; Steve 
> > > Ross-Talbot; WS Choreography
> > > Subject: Re: WSDL and pub/sub
> > >
> > >
> > > It would also be highly unlikely that the ebXML Registry adopt 
> > > WS-Eventing or WS-Notification from the standpoint of their main 
> > > mission. The event notification feature of the registry 
> is based on 
> > > registry contents (subscriptions to RegistryObjects, etc.) rather 
> > > than subscriptions to Web Services themselves.
> > >
> > > Kind Regards,
> > > Joe Chiusano
> > > Member, ebXML Registry TC
> > >
> > > "Monica J. Martin" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >Corda: Farrukh,
> > > > >
> > > > >Do you guys have any plan of adopting one of the 
> emerging pub/sub 
> > > > >specs, i.e. WS-Eventing or WS-Notification?
> > > > >
> > > > >Thank you,
> > > > >Ugo
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > mm1: I believe someone on this list has already questioned the 
> > > > implications of any open standards' body adopting proprietary 
> > > > specifications.
> > >
> 
Received on Monday, 16 February 2004 14:42:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 01:00:51 GMT