W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-async-tf@w3.org > April 2005

Re: Proposed issue text

From: Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 12:18:38 -0700
Message-ID: <425ACD8E.1060505@oracle.com>
To: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>
CC: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>, public-ws-async-tf@w3.org

Glen Daniels wrote:
>  
> Hi Mark:
> 
> 
>>In terms of justification, I think the issue is more 
>>fundamental; the  
>>WS-A charter says that we will define
>>
>>
>>>[t]he use of these abstract message properties in the 
>>
>>context of all  
>>
>>>WSDL 1.1 or WSDL 2.0 Message Exchange Patterns, including the  
>>>asynchronous use of these MEPs.
>>
>>That's pretty specific; we have to define how MAPs are used in *all*  
>>MEPs asynchronously.
>>
>>The issue description can follow from this; in WSDL 1.1, we 
>>we nee to  
>>describe how to do Request-Response or Solicit-Response 
>>asynchronously  
>>with MAPs, and in WSDL 2.0 we need to be able to do In-Out,  
>>In-Optional-Out, Out-In or Out-Optional-In asynchronously with MAPs.
>>
>>Because those MEPs and their bindings to particular protocols 
>>need some  
>>work to enable asynchrony, we have some dependancies on that 
>>work being  
>>done.
> 
> 
> OK, so how about :
> 
> Our charter indicates that we must specify how the MAPs are to be used
> in order to achieve asynchrony with all WSDL 1.1 and 2.0 MEPs ([insert
> list here]).  At present there is no interoperable way to do this,
> partially due to limitations or omissions which exist in the current
> SOAP and WSDL specs.  In order for the WS-Addressing group to declare
> victory (and build a functional test suite), these limitations/omissions
> must be remedied.
> 
> --Glen
> 
> P.S.  With regard to the MEP list above, I assume we also want to add
> Robust-In-Only to the WSDL 2.0 list.  Also, do we want to say anything
> about using MAPs as the "secret sauce" enabling Out-Only and its ilk?
> 

Since, MAPs are in the SOAP message (typically), I'm not sure how it 
helps enabling out-only. Don't things like SOAP-Response MEP and the 
corresponding HTTP binding fit the bill here better than MAPs?

-Anish
--
Received on Monday, 11 April 2005 19:19:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Monday, 11 April 2005 19:19:02 GMT