W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-async-tf@w3.org > April 2005

Re: Proposed issue text

From: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 12:02:15 -0700
Message-Id: <c286148e7b96988803195daa8acce4d8@bea.com>
Cc: <public-ws-async-tf@w3.org>
To: "Glen Daniels" <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>

On Apr 11, 2005, at 5:45 AM, Glen Daniels wrote:
> Our charter indicates that we must specify how the MAPs are to be used
> in order to achieve asynchrony with all WSDL 1.1 and 2.0 MEPs ([insert
> list here]).  At present there is no interoperable way to do this,
> partially due to limitations or omissions which exist in the current
> SOAP and WSDL specs.  In order for the WS-Addressing group to declare
> victory (and build a functional test suite), these 
> limitations/omissions
> must be remedied.

Fine. It would also be good to reflect that even once the 
limitations/omissions are addressed, we'll need to do some 
Addressing-specific work as well.

> P.S.  With regard to the MEP list above, I assume we also want to add
> Robust-In-Only to the WSDL 2.0 list.


> Also, do we want to say anything
> about using MAPs as the "secret sauce" enabling Out-Only and its ilk?

Good question; probably, since we have to demonstrate the use of MAPs 
for all MEPs.

Mark Nottingham   Principal Technologist
Office of the CTO   BEA Systems
Received on Monday, 11 April 2005 19:02:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:48:42 UTC