W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > January 2007

Re: Implementing CR38 - new namespace

From: David Illsley <david.illsley@uk.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 15:13:01 +0000
To: "Rogers, Tony" <Tony.Rogers@ca.com>
Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org, public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF6F8DA7DF.6A9930AE-ON80257259.00533CE1-80257259.005391C4@uk.ibm.com>

I'm in favour of 2 also.

Philippe pointed out that the prefix in the spec is unimportant (and I 
agree) but.. I think it'd be good to change it anyway for clarity.

David

David Illsley
Web Services Development
MP211, IBM Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
+44 (0)1962 815049 (Int. 245049)
david.illsley@uk.ibm.com



From:
"Rogers, Tony" <Tony.Rogers@ca.com>
To:
<public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Date:
01/03/2007 12:21 PM
Subject:
Implementing CR38 - new namespace


In answer to CR38, we resolved that we would use a new namespace in 
connection with the document formerly known as the WSDL Binding (now the 
Metadata document), but we did not resolve what that new namespace would 
be. I see two options:
 
1.  we continue to use a namespace ending in wsdl, and simply change the 
year and month
 
2.  we change the suffix to metadata, as well as changing the year and 
month
 
My inclination is option 2, but I am not opposed to option 1.
 
If we do the latter, would we want to change the namespace prefix in the 
document from wsaw to wsam? That would involve a great many changes, 
albeit small ones.
 
Tony Rogers
 
Received on Thursday, 4 January 2007 15:13:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:15 GMT