W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > October 2006

Re: An Example Use of RM's MakeConnection

From: Paul Fremantle <pzfreo@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 18:23:36 +0100
Message-ID: <88f5d710610101023y37628109g44438c6a0c23fba2@mail.gmail.com>
To: "David Hull" <dmh@tibco.com>
Cc: "Marc Hadley" <Marc.Hadley@sun.com>, "Doug Davis" <dug@us.ibm.com>, "[WS-A] Public List" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>

I think a lot of this discussion needs to be copied or cross-posted to
WS-RX. Is there any chance that

1) the key members of this discussion could become members of RX? or
2) the WSA WG could formally commit some of this discussion as PR
comment to the RX working group.

Its just that it seems like some of this is suggestions to the RX TC
rather than comments on the WSA issue! In particular I'd like the
discussion of Marc's suggested flow to be visible and commented on by
the RX TC.

Paul

-- 
Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology, WSO2
OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair

http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
paul@wso2.com

"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com


On 10/10/06, David Hull <dmh@tibco.com> wrote:
>
> Marc Hadley wrote:
> > On Oct 10, 2006, at 11:56 AM, Doug Davis wrote:
> >>
> >> And what is the GetQuoteResponse message a reply to?
> >
> > The wsrm:MakeConnection.
> >
> >> If its a reply to the original request and that request had a replyTo
> >> set to anon then per the WSA rules the GetQuoteResponse should have
> >> flowed back on the original backchannel but it didn't.
> >>
> > It sounds like you are still thinking in terms of the application
> > level. GetQuoteResponse is an application-level response to GetQuote
> > but, as I noted earlier in the thread, WS-Addr doesn't work at the
> > application level so there isn't a conflict.
> Again, what does this mean?
>
> If I say
> <ReplyTo><Address>mailto:Marc.Handley@Sun.com</Address></ReplyTo>, what
> kind of response am I asking to have mailed to you?  A "SOAP response"?
> An "application-level response"?  An "email response"?  Please cite any
> definitions you use.
>
> If the request above is SOAP/HTTP, then (barring error) there will be no
> SOAP response at all (that's what "request-optional-response" is for).
> So what sort of response is going where?
>
> Finally, in what WSA-visible way is this bread-and-butter scenario
> different to the scenario Doug is describing?
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 10 October 2006 17:23:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:15 GMT