Sounds like it's a request-optional response HTTP binding that y'all are looking for. Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: mbaker@gmail.com [mailto:mbaker@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Mark Baker > Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 11:41 AM > To: David Orchard > Cc: Christopher B Ferris; WS-Addressing > Subject: Re: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc > > On 1/20/06, David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com> wrote: > > So y'all are looking for a binding that says a 202 is allowed and if so, > > the response may or may not contain a SOAP envelope. It's the > > preclusion of the soap envelope that's the problem? > > From my POV, yep! > > Mark.Received on Friday, 20 January 2006 19:44:34 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:31 GMT