- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:41:15 -0500
- To: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Cc: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>, WS-Addressing <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
On 1/20/06, David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com> wrote: > So y'all are looking for a binding that says a 202 is allowed and if so, > the response may or may not contain a SOAP envelope. It's the > preclusion of the soap envelope that's the problem? >From my POV, yep! Mark.
Received on Friday, 20 January 2006 19:41:30 UTC