W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > March 2005

Re: Editorial work on issue 53 complete

From: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 14:08:15 -0800
Message-Id: <abb56239f5986c28fb11150abaf78de5@bea.com>
Cc: "Marc Hadley" <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
To: "Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>

I'll put this on the agenda for Monday as potentially reopening issue  
53 (new information); please discuss beforehand.


On Mar 8, 2005, at 2:00 PM, Yalcinalp, Umit wrote:

>
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org
>> [mailto:public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org]
>> Sent: Tuesday, Mar 08, 2005 12:57 PM
>> To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
>> Subject: Editorial work on issue 53 complete
>>
>>
>> All,
>>
>> I've incorporated the resolution to issue 53 as discussed on Monday,
>> the two schema docs can be found at:
>>
>> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2004/ws/addressing/ws-addr.xsd
>> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2004/ws/addressing/ws-addr- 
>> wsdl.xsd
>>
>> We didn't discuss this at the F2F (IIRC) but I wonder if we should
>> further split ws-addr.xsd to move the SOAP-binding-specific stuff into
>> a separate schema ?
>>
>> Marc.
>
> Marc,
>
> I just looked at the schemas you provided. I noticed that the top level
> elements are those that correspond to MAPs and EPR.
>
> I would like to see MetaData element as a top level element to
> facilitate its reuse, but it is defined within the complexType
> EndpointReferenceType as a local element.
>
> Therefore, this is a new issue with respect the schema, although it
> requires a very simple fix.
>
>>
>> ---
>> Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com>
>> Web Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems.
>>
>
> Cheers,
>
> --umit
>
>>
>>
>
>

--
Mark Nottingham   Principal Technologist
Office of the CTO   BEA Systems
Received on Tuesday, 8 March 2005 22:08:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:04 GMT