I'll put this on the agenda for Monday as potentially reopening issue 53 (new information); please discuss beforehand. On Mar 8, 2005, at 2:00 PM, Yalcinalp, Umit wrote: > > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org >> [mailto:public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org] >> Sent: Tuesday, Mar 08, 2005 12:57 PM >> To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org >> Subject: Editorial work on issue 53 complete >> >> >> All, >> >> I've incorporated the resolution to issue 53 as discussed on Monday, >> the two schema docs can be found at: >> >> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2004/ws/addressing/ws-addr.xsd >> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2004/ws/addressing/ws-addr- >> wsdl.xsd >> >> We didn't discuss this at the F2F (IIRC) but I wonder if we should >> further split ws-addr.xsd to move the SOAP-binding-specific stuff into >> a separate schema ? >> >> Marc. > > Marc, > > I just looked at the schemas you provided. I noticed that the top level > elements are those that correspond to MAPs and EPR. > > I would like to see MetaData element as a top level element to > facilitate its reuse, but it is defined within the complexType > EndpointReferenceType as a local element. > > Therefore, this is a new issue with respect the schema, although it > requires a very simple fix. > >> >> --- >> Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com> >> Web Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems. >> > > Cheers, > > --umit > >> >> > > -- Mark Nottingham Principal Technologist Office of the CTO BEA SystemsReceived on Tuesday, 8 March 2005 22:08:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:04 GMT