W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > June 2005

RE: Another go at lc75 and lc88 language (correction)

From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 16:18:41 +0100
Message-ID: <2B7789AAED12954AAD214AEAC13ACCEF2709E3B2@i2km02-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net>
To: <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com>, <tom@coastin.com>, <mark.little@arjuna.com>
Cc: <rsalz@datapower.com>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>

Bob said:

> If we specify that the message id must be unique, but do not specify the
> algorithm, does that not permit other protocols to define a specific
> algorithm more to their liking as long as the result remains an IRI?
> Would that not supply adequate flexibility?

Yes - I don't see how we could prevent others from specifying 
such algorithms layered upon the messageId, so long as the results are 
unique and fit into a messageId field.

Paul
Received on Wednesday, 8 June 2005 15:19:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:05 GMT